<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimizing for Bing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/</link>
	<description>Black Hat SEO and Website Network Building</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 17:57:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1136</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatdigest.com/?p=463#comment-1136</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve also done some testing with more competitive words with sites (well pages actually) that I&#039;ve been tweaking regularly to get them to rank well in Bing.  Here are a few more tips to get optimized properly for bing:

1.) Valid CSS/HTML
2.) Site Map
3.) Higher Keyword Density
4.) Grammar (I&#039;ll explain)

I had a few articles on a topic and that&#039;s it.  Since this wasn&#039;t a &quot;money&quot; experiment I didn&#039;t want to be writing for days for the content.  I decided to spin some content.  Let&#039;s just say it didn&#039;t go over well.

With the same metrics for the most part between the pages I tried to rank, the only one doing well is the &#039;original&#039; content.

Is there grammar checking going on?  Hmmm......

My next experiment is just having &#039;spun&#039; content linking to a page that has all the features listed above.  Single page sites that were all previously parked (and will go back to being parked after the experiment).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve also done some testing with more competitive words with sites (well pages actually) that I&#8217;ve been tweaking regularly to get them to rank well in Bing.  Here are a few more tips to get optimized properly for bing:</p>
<p>1.) Valid CSS/HTML<br />
2.) Site Map<br />
3.) Higher Keyword Density<br />
4.) Grammar (I&#8217;ll explain)</p>
<p>I had a few articles on a topic and that&#8217;s it.  Since this wasn&#8217;t a &#8220;money&#8221; experiment I didn&#8217;t want to be writing for days for the content.  I decided to spin some content.  Let&#8217;s just say it didn&#8217;t go over well.</p>
<p>With the same metrics for the most part between the pages I tried to rank, the only one doing well is the &#8216;original&#8217; content.</p>
<p>Is there grammar checking going on?  Hmmm&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>My next experiment is just having &#8217;spun&#8217; content linking to a page that has all the features listed above.  Single page sites that were all previously parked (and will go back to being parked after the experiment).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatdigest.com/?p=463#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>Well the optimizing for bing project changes yet again.  Looks like just a few dozen social links to this page moved me up a single spot in bing..... at first.

Then I realized I was still in the same position as before.  The difference is that &quot;bing.com&quot; isn&#039;t the first result any longer.  So this post is number 3 in the results same as before.  It&#039;s more of a change in how Bing is displaying things.

I haven&#039;t really dug through the pages that are ranking higher than this post yet.  However a quick glance shows both of them to be lengthy posts on well established sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the optimizing for bing project changes yet again.  Looks like just a few dozen social links to this page moved me up a single spot in bing&#8230;.. at first.</p>
<p>Then I realized I was still in the same position as before.  The difference is that &#8220;bing.com&#8221; isn&#8217;t the first result any longer.  So this post is number 3 in the results same as before.  It&#8217;s more of a change in how Bing is displaying things.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really dug through the pages that are ranking higher than this post yet.  However a quick glance shows both of them to be lengthy posts on well established sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatdigest.com/?p=463#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>O.K. -- I&#039;ve dropped down a few spots on bing.  I&#039;m going to go build a few links with the keyphrase optimizing for bing of course - let&#039;s see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K. &#8212; I&#8217;ve dropped down a few spots on bing.  I&#8217;m going to go build a few links with the keyphrase optimizing for bing of course &#8211; let&#8217;s see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatdigest.com/?p=463#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Hehe - Currently number 1 for the term &quot;optimizing for bing&quot; in google - while not a competitive term shows that blogs have some weight there as well.... or it could be the h tags, or the internal links to this page, or the age of the domain.

http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;hl=en&amp;rlz=&amp;=&amp;q=optimizing+for+bing&amp;btnG=Google+Search

I&#039;m number two in bing: (bing.com is higher)
http://www.bing.com/search?q=optimizing+for+bing&amp;go=&amp;form=QBLH&amp;qs=n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe &#8211; Currently number 1 for the term &#8220;optimizing for bing&#8221; in google &#8211; while not a competitive term shows that blogs have some weight there as well&#8230;. or it could be the h tags, or the internal links to this page, or the age of the domain.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;hl=en&amp;rlz=&amp;=&amp;q=optimizing+for+bing&amp;btnG=Google+Search" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;hl=en&amp;rlz=&amp;=&amp;q=optimizing+for+bing&amp;btnG=Google+Search</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m number two in bing: (bing.com is higher)<br />
<a href="http://www.bing.com/search?q=optimizing+for+bing&#038;go=&#038;form=QBLH&#038;qs=n" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com/search?q=optimizing+for+bing&#038;go=&#038;form=QBLH&#038;qs=n</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.blackhatdigest.com/uncategorized/optimizing-for-bing/comment-page-1/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blackhatdigest.com/?p=463#comment-829</guid>
		<description>Great website.  Where did you get this dirt on Bing from?

Anyways - please shoot me an email I have a proposition for you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great website.  Where did you get this dirt on Bing from?</p>
<p>Anyways &#8211; please shoot me an email I have a proposition for you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.337 seconds -->
