Comments on: Site Wide Linking!

By: Joel C. (lucky)

Joel C. (lucky) — Mon, 26 May 2008 17:15:20 +0000

I’m a lucky guy. A few weeks ago Ed asked me to put a number of websites in this system to test things out. I really didn’t know what he was up to at the time, but I’m glad I gave him my URLS.

Everything went smooth and I can see the links being added through Google Alerts.

By: admin

admin — Mon, 26 May 2008 05:24:14 +0000

There shouldn’t be many instances where you are on a page with more than 2 or 3 other links . Usually you will be one of the only (except for internal links to the site your link is on) links on the pages.

I’m adding about 20 sites a week to the network at present…. different platforms, different content, different topics, etc.. I don’t see a footprint problem. Your links should all be on related pages on sites that are related to that topic. I’ve got about 40 topics full blown and aged - and I’ll add anything we need as we go along.

I keep each ‘network’ pretty separate - I’m paranoid enough with just my own stuff.

The ‘only’ issue I would expect anyone to have is if they don’t have meta tags or titles on their pages. I’ll contact them and deal with that at that time if it’s an issue. Sometimes I can still grab enough data to do things when that’s not there - just depends on how the site is layed out.

By: daphcham

daphcham — Sun, 25 May 2008 17:31:59 +0000

Cool.
And is there enough variation in the link sources to leave a site in their over a number of months (or longer) without picking up too similar a footprint ie. too many links to each page from the same site/sites.

By: admin

admin — Sun, 25 May 2008 17:26:30 +0000

Different sources for the links - and we control all the places linking to you unlike the promotion center.

I use it for my WH sites and have been testing for about 4 months with no issues.

By: daphcham

daphcham — Sun, 25 May 2008 17:20:43 +0000

Is this service fine for white hat/money sites and how does it differ from the promotion centre.